HiveCheck
SCHOOL INTELLIGENCE · SIDE-BY-SIDE

Compare two schools.

A candidate interviewing at two schools doesn’t want two separate reports. A sitting Head doesn’t read about Phillips Andover alone — they read it alongside Lawrenceville. Pick two and read them in parallel.

DIFFERENT SCHOOL TYPES

The Westminster Schools is a day school; The Lawrenceville School is a boarding school. Day and boarding schools run on different financial models — they hold reserves differently, dorms and dining change the cost base, and lining up two different types can make a fair one look worse than it is. You can still read them side by side below; just keep the type difference in mind.

SCHOOL A · SAME-TYPE PEERS (DAY)
Other day schools to put alongside The Westminster Schools
SCHOOL B · SAME-TYPE PEERS (BOARDING)
Other boarding schools to put alongside The Lawrenceville School
SCHOOL A

The Westminster Schools

Atlanta, GA · Independent K-12 · NAIS member
SCHOOL B

The Lawrenceville School

Lawrenceville, NJ · Independent K-12 · NAIS memberBOARDING
THE BOTTOM LINE · IN PLAIN ENGLISH

On the money side, The Lawrenceville School looks the stronger of the two: its finances read as stable, against stable but worth keeping an eye on for The Westminster Schools.

The Lawrenceville School sits on the deeper reserve cushion — about 9.1 years of operating expenses set aside, against 4.2 years at The Westminster Schools.

The Lawrenceville School is the larger institution — $102.4M in annual revenue against $88.6M at The Westminster Schools (enrolling roughly 818 and 1,900 students, respectively).

One contrast worth flagging: The Westminster Schools leans far more on tuition — about 79% of its revenue comes from tuition and fees, versus 60% at The Lawrenceville School — so a soft enrollment year would hit it harder.

A quick read of the biggest differences. Every number behind it is in the columns below, each with a plain-English note on what the gap means.

SCHOOL A · THE READ

The Westminster Schools is burning the cushion faster than the 4.2-year buffer suggests. Expenses are outpacing revenue 5.8% vs -3.9% per year over three years, and the latest operating margin is -13.6% on a 79% tuition-dependent revenue mix. Covering the deficit at today's rate, it would take more than a decade to exhaust reserves — the full budget, by contrast, is covered for about 4.2 years if every revenue line stopped. The board conversation here is the recovery plan for the operating model and the timeline to break-even. NACUBO Composite Financial Index: 2.7 / 10, watch.

SCHOOL B · THE READ

The Lawrenceville School is burning the cushion faster than the 9.1-year buffer suggests. Expenses are outpacing revenue 4.6% vs -4.9% per year over three years, and the latest operating margin is -10.6% on a 60% tuition-dependent revenue mix. Covering the deficit at today's rate, it would take more than a decade to exhaust reserves — the full budget, by contrast, is covered for about 9.1 years if every revenue line stopped. The board conversation here is the recovery plan for the residential model and the timeline to break-even. NACUBO Composite Financial Index: 3.9 / 10, adequate — monitor.

Segment note · The Lawrenceville School. The Lawrenceville School is a residential boarding school. Boarding schools operate full residential programs on top of academics, which shifts how to read the financials: (a) reserve coverage is typically longer — 5-10 years is normal vs 1-3 for day schools, because dorms, dining, and residential plant carry capex obligations no day school has, (b) revenue per student is higher because tuition covers room and board, (c) tuition dependency can be high without being concerning if the endowment cushion is deep, (d) staff comp is often higher because residential faculty carry housing and benefits beyond salary. Read the percentiles below against same-segment peers, not the full K-12 cohort.

PANEL 01

Financial Health

HIGHER IS BETTER
Overall financial-health score (0–10)
A single 0–10 read that blends reserves, operating margin, and growth (the NACUBO index). Higher = stronger: 5+ strong, 3–5 adequate, under 3 worth watching.
School B scores higher on the overall financial-health measure.
A2.7
B3.9
-1.1
HIGHER IS BETTER
Reserve coverage (months of operating expense)
How many months the school could run on its reserves. More = a bigger safety net.
School B holds a deeper reserve cushion.
A4.2 yrs
B9.1 yrs
-4.9 yrs
HIGHER IS BETTER
Operating margin (latest year)
What's left after expenses, as a share of revenue. 3–8% is healthy; negative means it spent more than it took in.
School B ran a stronger operating margin — it kept more of what it took in.
A-13.6%
B-10.6%
-3.0 pp
LOWER IS BETTER
Reliance on tuition
Share of revenue that comes from tuition and fees. Higher = more exposed if enrollment dips.
School A leans more on tuition, so it's a little more exposed if enrollment softens.
A79.3%
B59.5%
+19.8 pp
CONTEXT ONLY
Share of budget spent on staff
Salaries and benefits as a share of spending. Typical range 55–70%; higher means more of the budget goes to people.
School A puts more of its budget toward staff pay and benefits.
A55.8%
B44.4%
HIGHER IS BETTER
Net assets (reserves on the books)
The school's accumulated reserves, from its latest Form 990.
School B has more set aside in net assets (its accumulated reserves).
A$420.9M
B$1.03B
-605.0M
CONTEXT ONLY
Annual revenue (latest)
Total revenue from the latest Form 990.
School B is the larger school by revenue.
A$88.6M
B$102.4M
CONTEXT ONLY
Head of School compensation
From the school's Form 990. Differences track school size and type.
Roughly the same.
A$1.1M
B$1.1M
HIGHER IS BETTER
Revenue growth (3-year average)
Average yearly change over three years. Healthy schools grow revenue at least as fast as expenses.
Roughly the same.
A-3.9%/yr
B-4.9%/yr
≈ even
HIGHER IS BETTER
Reserve growth (3-year average)
Average yearly change in reserves over three years. Positive = building the cushion; negative = drawing it down.
School B's reserves have been growing faster over the last three years.
A-0.9%/yr
B+0.6%/yr
-1.5 pp
PANEL 02

How each ranks against its peers

CONTEXT ONLY
Operating margin vs. its peers
Ranked against same-size, same-region peers. 100 = ahead of every peer; higher is better.
Roughly the same.
A3 / 100
B7 / 100
CONTEXT ONLY
Tuition reliance vs. its peers
Ranked against peers. A higher number means it leans on tuition more than most of them, which is riskier.
School A leans on tuition more than most of its own peers do.
A47 / 100
B17 / 100
CONTEXT ONLY
Staff-cost share vs. its peers
Ranked against peers. A higher number means more of the budget goes to staff than at most of them.
School A spends more of its budget on staff than most of its own peers.
A40 / 100
B20 / 100
CONTEXT ONLY
Endowment cushion vs. its peers
Ranked against peers. A higher number means a deeper endowment cushion than most of them.
School B holds a deeper endowment cushion than most of its own peers.
A73 / 100
B90 / 100
Each school is ranked against its own peer group (same size, region, and association), on a 0–100 scale. Because those peer groups differ from one school to the next, the rank numbers aren’t directly comparable between the two schools — for a true side-by-side, use the actual dollar and percentage figures in the panels above.
PANEL 03

Community & Demographics

CONTEXT ONLY
Metro area
AAtlanta, GA
BLawrenceville, NJ
CONTEXT ONLY
Metro population
Roughly the same.
A23,673
B31,323
HIGHER IS BETTER
Median household income
Typical household income locally. Read alongside cost of living, not on its own.
School A's area has higher household incomes.
A$189K
B$126K
+64K
HIGHER IS BETTER
Adults with a college degree or higher
Share of local adults with a college degree — a strong signal of the family pool.
School A's area is more college-educated.
A85.6%
B60.3%
+25.3 pp
HIGHER IS BETTER
Households earning $200K+
Share of local households at the top of the tuition-paying range.
School A's area has more high-earning households — a bigger tuition-paying base.
A48.3%
B25.5%
+22.8 pp
HIGHER IS BETTER
School-aged population (5-17)
How many school-aged children live in the area.
Roughly the same.
A4,194
B4,804
≈ even
CONTEXT ONLY
Median home value
Typical local home value today (a level, not a trend). Which way prices are moving is in Demand Trajectory below.
School A's area has pricier homes.
A$1.1M
B$428K
CONTEXT ONLY
Students enrolled (when reported)
Actual enrollment from the federal private-school survey, when the school is matched to it.
School A enrolls more students.
A1,900
B818
LOWER IS BETTER
Students per teacher
Students per teacher, from the federal private-school survey. Lower usually means smaller classes.
Roughly the same.
A7.5:1
B7.0:1
≈ even
CONTEXT ONLY
Grade range
AK–12
B9–12
PANEL 04

Community Capacity

HIGHER IS BETTER
Paying Capacity (0 to 100)
HiveCheck score. Can families here afford tuition? Higher = more capacity.
School A's community can more readily afford tuition.
A
67 / 100
moderate
B
61 / 100
moderate
+6 pts
HIGHER IS BETTER
Local giving climate (0 to 100)
HiveCheck score of the surrounding area's philanthropic climate (local charitable-gift patterns + high-income density from IRS charitable-giving data + Census). Market context, not a read on this school's own fundraising.
School A's surrounding area has a stronger local giving climate (a market-context read, not this school's own fundraising).
A
99 / 100
strong
B
28 / 100
thin
+71 pts
HIGHER IS BETTER
Average charitable gift on local tax returns
Average gift reported on itemized tax returns in the surrounding area (from IRS charitable-giving data). A local giving-climate signal, not a read on this school's own gifts.
School A's area reports a larger average charitable gift on local tax returns (a local giving-climate read, not this school's own gifts).
A$91K
B$8K
+83K
HIGHER IS BETTER
Share of taxpayers who itemize
Share of local taxpayers who itemize deductions — a rough giving signal, less reliable since the 2018 tax-law change.
School A's area has a higher share of itemizing (giving-inclined) taxpayers.
A42.9%
B12.7%
+30.2 pp
HIGHER IS BETTER
Average income per tax return
Average income reported on local tax returns, across all filers.
School A's area reports higher average income per tax return.
A$681K
B$110K
+572K
Both scores are HiveCheck-computed (not federal statistics), relative to HiveCheck’s covered universe, on roughly a 3-year IRS lag. The honest withhold ( Not enough local data ) fires when an input is missing for the area; no number is invented and no delta is computed.
PANEL 05

Competitive Landscape

CONTEXT ONLY
Public schools in county
The nearby public schools families weigh against the private option.
School A's county has more public schools nearby.
A200
B109
CONTEXT ONLY
Public K-12 students in county
Public-school students in the county — the pool families choose among.
School A's county has more public-school students.
A139,584
B56,529
CONTEXT ONLY
Charter schools in county
Public-school alternatives. Not a count of private schools.
School A's county has more charter schools.
A37
B8
County-level public-school aggregates. HiveCheck does not rate individual schools, public or private.
PANEL 06

Demand Trajectory

CONTEXT ONLY
Net move-ins (high-income households)
Federal county move data. Positive = more high-income households moving in than out.
Both areas are losing high-income households.
A-2,799 returns
B-1,077 returns
CONTEXT ONLY
Net income moving in or out
The income that moves with those households, in whole dollars.
In both areas, more high-earner income is moving out than in.
A-$644.6M
B-$206.0M
CONTEXT ONLY
Home-price trend (3-yr)
Federal home-price index over three years — a read on which way local wealth is moving.
Home prices are rising in both areas.
A+11.8%
B+27.5%
CONTEXT ONLY
Home-price direction
A one-word read on where home prices are heading, from the 3-year trend.
Arising
Brising
Move data runs about two years behind, and the home-price index covers a wider area than the rest of this section. Direction only here — neither an inflow nor an outflow is shaded good or bad.
PANEL 07

Local Economy

LOWER IS BETTER
Unemployment rate
Local unemployment. Lower = steadier family incomes, but also a tighter market for hiring teachers.
School B's area has higher unemployment.
A1.6%
B5.9%
-4.3 pp
CONTEXT ONLY
Total jobs in the area (thousands)
Total jobs locally, latest reading.
School A sits in a larger job market.
A4,983K
B4,382K
HIGHER IS BETTER
Job growth (year over year)
Positive = a growing job market.
Roughly the same.
A+0.1%
B+0.1%
≈ even
HIGHER IS BETTER
Income per person (area average)
Average income per person, county level.
School A's area has higher income per person.
A$111K
B$87K
+24K
LOWER IS BETTER
Typical 2-bedroom rent (monthly)
Federal rental benchmark. Higher = more pressure on faculty housing.
Roughly the same.
A$2K/mo
B$2K/mo
≈ even
SOURCES: IRS FORM 990 · U.S. CENSUS BUREAU, ACS · U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS · NCES PSS · COMPILED BY LOMUSCIO LABS
DATA THROUGH FY2024 · LAST REFRESHED 2026-05-13